<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New 27&#8243; iMacs wake up on the wrong side of the CPU</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20091031/27-imacs-wake-wrong-side-cpu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20091031/27-imacs-wake-wrong-side-cpu/</link>
	<description>Playing with cool gadgets in the ongoing search for the Coolest Gadget</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:53:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple updates iMac line with new models &#124; Internet News</title>
		<link>http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20091031/27-imacs-wake-wrong-side-cpu/comment-page-1/#comment-448560</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple updates iMac line with new models &#124; Internet News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/?p=32867#comment-448560</guid>
		<description>[...] New 27&#8243; iMacs wake up on the wrong side of the CPU [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] New 27&#8243; iMacs wake up on the wrong side of the CPU [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zuse84</title>
		<link>http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20091031/27-imacs-wake-wrong-side-cpu/comment-page-1/#comment-439444</link>
		<dc:creator>zuse84</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/?p=32867#comment-439444</guid>
		<description>Good GOD! Regardless of the flash issue, clearly the model mac has issues that need to be worked out. With regard to flash, it you guys need to quit bitching, you cant really expect it to me multi-platform and work perfectly on multiple browsers. PS: Apple sucks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good GOD! Regardless of the flash issue, clearly the model mac has issues that need to be worked out. With regard to flash, it you guys need to quit bitching, you cant really expect it to me multi-platform and work perfectly on multiple browsers. PS: Apple sucks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ron</title>
		<link>http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20091031/27-imacs-wake-wrong-side-cpu/comment-page-1/#comment-400801</link>
		<dc:creator>ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 07:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/?p=32867#comment-400801</guid>
		<description>I just returned my first ever 27 imac which couldn&#039;t even run  3  quick time clips simultaneously without serious overheating. My old dinosaur HP with Windows XP could do it effortlessly.

Right out of the box my second 27&quot; imac started flickering heavily/ around  every 20 - 30 seconds.  Oh Noooooo
I restarted the computer and now am researching the problem on the internet.     So far , since restarting, no flickering problem.
I am hoping it was a one time fluke,  I only had safari opened and no videos at the time of the flickering problem</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just returned my first ever 27 imac which couldn&#8217;t even run  3  quick time clips simultaneously without serious overheating. My old dinosaur HP with Windows XP could do it effortlessly.</p>
<p>Right out of the box my second 27&#8243; imac started flickering heavily/ around  every 20 &#8211; 30 seconds.  Oh Noooooo<br />
I restarted the computer and now am researching the problem on the internet.     So far , since restarting, no flickering problem.<br />
I am hoping it was a one time fluke,  I only had safari opened and no videos at the time of the flickering problem</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viddy</title>
		<link>http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20091031/27-imacs-wake-wrong-side-cpu/comment-page-1/#comment-397507</link>
		<dc:creator>viddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/?p=32867#comment-397507</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had bigger problems than flash, I&#039;m already on IMAC 27&quot; number 3. The first was returned because of a dead pixel, the so called Mac Genius at the Apple store tried to migrate my info from one system to another, and corrupted the hard drive....1 week old. Computer #2 starts up like the optical drive is about to blow up......going back to get #3 next week. Called Apple Head office to complain, they&#039;re sending me a 1TB time capsule for free next week.......I have a feeling Mac #4 isn&#039;t too far away.

Not impressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had bigger problems than flash, I&#8217;m already on IMAC 27&#8243; number 3. The first was returned because of a dead pixel, the so called Mac Genius at the Apple store tried to migrate my info from one system to another, and corrupted the hard drive&#8230;.1 week old. Computer #2 starts up like the optical drive is about to blow up&#8230;&#8230;going back to get #3 next week. Called Apple Head office to complain, they&#8217;re sending me a 1TB time capsule for free next week&#8230;&#8230;.I have a feeling Mac #4 isn&#8217;t too far away.</p>
<p>Not impressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20091031/27-imacs-wake-wrong-side-cpu/comment-page-1/#comment-397017</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/?p=32867#comment-397017</guid>
		<description>Why is that method any better? In many ways, it&#039;s worse. Let&#039;s say that you&#039;re running the same application on a Core 2 Duo and a Core 2 Quad and the application uses 100% of a single core, but none of the other cores. The way Apple does it, the rating is 100% regardless of whether it&#039;s a duo or a quad. Your way, the rating changes, depending on which system it is on.

Regardless, whether it&#039;s right or wrong, that&#039;s the way Apple is doing is, so people whining about how 105% isn&#039;t possible are clearly clueless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is that method any better? In many ways, it&#8217;s worse. Let&#8217;s say that you&#8217;re running the same application on a Core 2 Duo and a Core 2 Quad and the application uses 100% of a single core, but none of the other cores. The way Apple does it, the rating is 100% regardless of whether it&#8217;s a duo or a quad. Your way, the rating changes, depending on which system it is on.</p>
<p>Regardless, whether it&#8217;s right or wrong, that&#8217;s the way Apple is doing is, so people whining about how 105% isn&#8217;t possible are clearly clueless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric O.</title>
		<link>http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20091031/27-imacs-wake-wrong-side-cpu/comment-page-1/#comment-397012</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric O.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/?p=32867#comment-397012</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know a whole lot about Macs, but showing 200% for a fully-utilized dual-core CPU seems a little odd.  On other systems I&#039;ve used, they still only go up to 100%, no matter how many cores you have, and for a dual-core CPU, if only one core is being used, it would show 50% usage; if one core of a quad-core CPU is being used, it would show 25%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know a whole lot about Macs, but showing 200% for a fully-utilized dual-core CPU seems a little odd.  On other systems I&#8217;ve used, they still only go up to 100%, no matter how many cores you have, and for a dual-core CPU, if only one core is being used, it would show 50% usage; if one core of a quad-core CPU is being used, it would show 25%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Object Caching 361/365 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.coolest-gadgets.com

Served from: www.coolest-gadgets.com @ 2012-02-10 20:19:06 -->
