Wrist watch Tattoo

by Mark R in Conceptual Gadgets

17 Comments on “Wrist watch Tattoo”

Nick Says:

July 10th, 2009 at 11:46 am

I think its a fake

Bubba7 Says:

July 10th, 2009 at 1:01 pm

If it is real, which I doubt, a slight advancement in display tech, as you still need the external clock for time sync. Now, if this had its own internal sync it would be an improvement.

My next question is: features? Stopwatch? Night Light? Alarm? Otherwise, what is the benefit of having this attached besides always knowing what time it is? Or am I wrong?

But now, when someone invents this as a fully internal HUD, call me, yea?

gary Says:

July 10th, 2009 at 1:41 pm

Super fake. There would be an obvious lump under his skin. You can see his veins through the numbers. So unless they created see-through electronics while I wasn’t looking, this guy or really hairy chick should get an epic slap to the mouth. Concepts are ok, as long as you are touting them as such. But, super obvious fake stuff makes me mad.
Other faults:

It wouldn’t be black, it would have to be illuminated by something(Radium(harmfully radioactive), Tritium, Phosphorus, a laser).

Kinetic watches don’t provide electricity they manually wind your watch.

You would have a giant lump under your skin from the lcd.

Your body can act as a battery, due to the ph, but it would be very hot(and I am pretty sure having a skin watch wouldn’t be worth having the feeling of someone putting a cigerette out on your wrist perpetually).

People are made of water, so having bare electronics under your skin would short them out(then you would just have a gross lump under your skin)

There are very few inert materials that can be inserted under the skin and not be rejected by your body. That is why piercings have to go through fleshy tissue and not just skin. Imagine a splinter the size of a watch being rejected by your body. So, instead of a cool watch, you would have a seeping, possibly infected wound.

But hey, what do I know. Guess, I’m just not rich enough to pay the price for cool.

Miriah Katz Says:

July 10th, 2009 at 3:01 pm

seems that if this product was real there would be a link to where to get it or more information about it, or at least some information about who developed it and where. that’s in other coolest gadget posts. so, don’t expect to be believed, and why are you wasting people’s time with stuff like this?

Aliza G Says:

July 10th, 2009 at 8:00 pm

But….what if you move to different time zone???? What about daylight savings time? How would you turn your clock back? By walking backwards?

Michael Says:

July 10th, 2009 at 10:18 pm

Hoax.

Chris Says:

July 11th, 2009 at 1:45 am

Its a fake you bad journo’s. Anyone can see its been photoshopped….duh!

Viper the mystery cook Says:

July 11th, 2009 at 8:58 am

I’m tempted to think this is actually real

Jan Shelton Says:

July 11th, 2009 at 5:46 pm

Personally I love the watch. I’m tired of spending my money on watches. Think of the reactions you’ll get when someone asks you for the time. This is one I would buy.

angel Says:

July 11th, 2009 at 5:52 pm

whAt is the advantage of this invention?

Another David Says:

July 12th, 2009 at 9:01 am

oh come on, it doesn’t even crease with his wrist! fake fake fake fake fake. i could have done a better job in ms paint.

Black and White Clock » Coolest Gadgets Says:

July 13th, 2009 at 9:59 am

[...] me start by saying that I was amazed at the many numbers of comments that we had at the Wrist Watch Tattoo. Several of them said that telling time with an ever-changing digital tattoo on the wrist was a [...]

Tattoo Ed Says:

July 23rd, 2009 at 11:07 am

This looks very fake to me. But definately a cool idea. I would not be suprised to see something similar in 10 years.

john shupe Says:

August 6th, 2009 at 10:45 pm

Seems so unreal. Who would want a clock on there wrist that cant personalize ,seems that is what everyone wants these days personalization. I guess that only way to know if this is legit if we see it on the market soon ,, huh

disjointedimages Says:

August 13th, 2009 at 1:15 pm

If you check the source, the original poster states “There isn’t a whole lot of information on his design, but I am going to assume for now that it is only a concept. ” So it’s not a question of real or fake.

The question was what is your opinion of taking it to this step, of completely integrating an electronic device in such a manner that isn’t life supporting.

ak Says:

August 14th, 2009 at 12:25 pm

it is real, just not an implant. if you look closely, you’ll see that it’s a very thin clear material with simple digital numbers. energy-wise, it would be very low-consumption so any little bit of energy it is designed to use should easily power such a small/simple function.

Aklestes Says:

September 9th, 2009 at 7:37 am

Now when they invent moving tribal style designs that can snake around the body at the users will, call me.

Post a Comment

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail