Comments on: Smoking Everywhere for a healthier you

By: smoking fetish girls smoking

smoking fetish girls smoking — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:59:12 +0000

There are a lot of brands on the market. smoking everwhere is one of the 2 companies that got slammed by the FDA this fall. Not really their fault, they just import from China like everyone else. Crazy double standard that the FDA is trying to impose with their study… ban e-cigs yet regulate and allow regular cigarettes. Clearly e-cigs need to be embraced, the doors of commerce opened, and products produced that are as low toxic as possible. I read a whole lot of forum posts and e-cigs are really helping people that want to cut back or stop smoking tobacco, but big brother is doing everything they can to put a stop to it.

By: Dominator

Dominator — Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:38:48 +0000

Like to Tell everyone on the forum, I been smoking for 17yrs , I been trying to stop , slow down , write notes , take pills Clantix , I cant help the desire to puff.
take a puff break durring work, drive and smoke, after meals , and COFEE
Then I found Smoke everywhere gold this week, Its changing my life now. Less and less I’m smoking cigaretts today 6cigs, and puff vapors that taste better in between.
For now Im vap 18mg of nicotine and as time goes by to a 0mg. I even started to enjoy flavors over tobacco taste,
Someday very soon, I will rid of Cigarettes Forever and never buy another pack. Even Vaping will be a past time with reading a book next to the fireplace.
I’m going to fly a long flight in a few days,
I wont advertise me vaping but i will vapor under my flight blanket. Does anyone knpw if the screeners will say anything if this e-cig is in my bag?

By: Yeppa123

Yeppa123 — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 07:29:48 +0000

I just had lunch in front of an “everywhere smoker”, and as an ex smoker I’m very picky about cigarette smell. With this thing however, not a trace of smell whatsoever, even though the person was sitting in front of me across the table and “smoking” vapor. Quite unbelievable. I’d love to see some study to see how much of a fraction of a percent of nicotine I got to absorb as a second hand “everywhere smoker”.

By: LaceyUnderall

LaceyUnderall — Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:23:39 +0000

JEmlay quote: “this can be an irritant to ones eyes.”

There has been no finding on this in regards to the electronic cigarette. There have also been no complaints on any of the e-cig forums regarding this issue. The vapor dissipates quickly and in fact is just that, a water-based vapor.

By: JEmlay

JEmlay — Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:10:02 +0000

Francis is wrong. The law does not state no smoking TOBACCO in public areas. It claims NO SMOKING in public areas. That means smoking ANYTHING.

Tobacco, pot, crack…. legal or illegal. NO SMOKING means NO SMOKING.

I don’t care if these are healthier. Putting ANYTHING in your lungs that isn’t found in our natural atmosphere can be a hazardous. Also, this can be an irritant to ones eyes.

NO SMOKING still stands.

By: LaceyUnderall

LaceyUnderall — Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:05:53 +0000

Claiming that the e-cig is healthier for you is probably not a good thing. Industry wide, US suppliers are not promoting this as a healthy smoking alternative, just as a smoking alternative. Common sense can tell you that as it contains no tobacco and there is a lack of second hand smoke, it could possibly be a healthier option, but claims to such when they are untested are irresponsible.

The e-cig should be sold and marketed as an ALTERNATIVE to smoking regular cigarettes. Shame.

By: Francis

Francis — Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:17:43 +0000

Existing anti-smoking laws are only applicable to tobacco products. Electronic cigarettes do not contain any tobacco, and are not subject to these laws. You could legally sell an electronic cigarette to a 5 year old, because it is not a tobacco product.

I’m not sure that any scientific study has been done to validate the safety of electronic cigarettes.