http://gearturbine.260mb.com/

YouTuve Video: Gearturbine – Retrodynamic

“Gearturbine”-Dic, 1991 IMPI Patent Mexico #197187-Retrodynamic dextrogiro vs levogiro effect-Non parasitic losses engine system for cooling lubrication combustion-2 Very long distance cautive compression inflow propulsion conduits like a digestive system in perfect equilibrium well balanced star were end like a snake bite his own tale-4 Pairs of dynamic turbos-Direct planetary gear thrust like a YING YANG-2 Inflow propulsion opposite flames like 2 dragoons.

On a more serious note, why is this Mark R guy who wrote the article simply taking these claims at face value? This industry is full of BS. A study done by MIT showed that small wind turbines produce less than 30% of what the manufacturers claim, on average. Knowing quite a lot about this industry, I would peg the number for this turbine at even less than that. I can’t see the torque needed to start turning a generator. This is all pointless anyway, look up Newton and Betz. Energy extraction from wind is all based in physics. There are laws that govern what can be produced. At the rooftop level, the wind simply isn’t there. Its not the case that you get the same output form 3 mph winds for 2 hours as you would 6 mph winds for 1 hour. It isn’t a linear relationship. It would take almost 2 days of 3 mph winds to get the same output from a single hour of 10 mph winds. The relationship is that drastic. That’s why turbines are so high in the air, thats where the winds are.

I hope to be proved wrong though, coal fired utility plants have to go!

You can watch a video of Philippe speak at TED at

http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/philippe_starck_thinks_deep_on_design.html