<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Low-end MacBooks bested by their predecessors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20080305/low-end-macbooks-bested-by-their-predecessors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20080305/low-end-macbooks-bested-by-their-predecessors/</link>
	<description>Playing with cool gadgets in the ongoing search for the Coolest Gadget</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:53:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordo</title>
		<link>http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20080305/low-end-macbooks-bested-by-their-predecessors/comment-page-1/#comment-331288</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 14:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20080305/low-end-macbooks-bested-by-their-predecessors/#comment-331288</guid>
		<description>Lab Tests from MacWorld tell a different story:
http://www.macworld.com/article/132362/2008/03/macbookcore2duo.html#performance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lab Tests from MacWorld tell a different story:<br />
<a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/132362/2008/03/macbookcore2duo.html#performance" rel="nofollow">http://www.macworld.com/article/132362/2008/03/macbookcore2duo.html#performance</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Object Caching 270/274 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.coolest-gadgets.com

Served from: www.coolest-gadgets.com @ 2012-02-11 01:43:32 -->
