Comments on: Puppy Wireless Spy Camera

By: 8.6.6.6.

8.6.6.6. — Sat, 01 Mar 2008 05:57:22 +0000

Ever heard of Alex Rider?
its definetly good for undercover

By: Tiago

Tiago — Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:10:11 +0000

@dx, do you really think the only reason for spy cams is check “hot girls”? Really?!?!

@Picasso, for some people it might be obvious where the camera is located, but I think “naive” people wouldn’t notice.

By: Another Gallery of Posts » Coolest Gadgets

Another Gallery of Posts » Coolest Gadgets — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:22:14 +0000

[...] Subscribe because cannot be wrong! « Puppy Wireless Spy Camera [...]

By: Picasso

Picasso — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 05:33:06 +0000

Maybe if the cam was in the eye and make both eyes appear the same, nobody would know it’s actually a spy cam in one eye, but the nose and a RED lense- gee wonder what that is huh? LOL! I wouldn’t pay $10 for this poorly developed “spy” cam.

By: Picasso

Picasso — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 05:30:23 +0000

It’s obvious where the cam was before I even read of the location. Anyone can figure this out with a little common sense. Not a very good “undercover” spy cam in my opinion.

By: dx

dx — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:32:34 +0000

Why would someone need this? Only reason i could think of is for perverts to give to a hot girl and watch them in their room… or for twisted little kids to spy on their sisters (or brothers now days)