<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RAID Storage in the a flash …</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20071023/raid-storage-in-the-a-flash-%e2%80%a6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20071023/raid-storage-in-the-a-flash-%e2%80%a6/</link>
	<description>Playing with cool gadgets in the ongoing search for the Coolest Gadget</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:29:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: terry</title>
		<link>http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20071023/raid-storage-in-the-a-flash-%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-340337</link>
		<dc:creator>terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20071023/raid-storage-in-the-a-flash-%e2%80%a6/#comment-340337</guid>
		<description>Hold on there DEXX; Lets not put the cart before the horse. You&#039;ve seen this card do 80 mb/s ! ?
  I try in vainly to wait for &quot;the truth to ring&quot; when I hear it; But what I have heard one to many times, is that this card slows down !, when increasing the number of cf&#039;s from two to four ? And the only sumwhat lagit. test I&#039;ve found claims 40 mb/s ! A single CF (233mb/s) or better will do that.  The only word you have to know is &quot;DMA&quot; And thats because there are well over a thousand CF to IDE adaptors, for a dollar,on EBay, that are not ! They max at 20mb/s. DMA and UDMA are your clues to a CF to IDE adaptor to do the job. But don&#039;t assume!; that is, that a $24 name brand adaptor with &quot;those words&quot; will cut the mustard. In fact I have had no responce from &quot;Addonics&quot; and a $3 CF to IDE DNA - UDMA from China, has been benchmarked by the Hong Kong supplier and a users who says it listed (in Linux) as UDMA 4 and exceeded 40mb/s with a &quot;Scandisk Extreme 4&quot; The CF to SATA are poping up at 50mb/s benches (faster CF though) and these may break the bank at $5 to $8 (China) The final point is that a &quot;no card needed&quot; USB flash will max out about 33mb/s (with 233x - 266x memory) So a $50 card and two or four high speed CF&#039;s!?!. LUCIE GOT SOME SPLAIN&#039;IN TO DO !

Thanks
Terry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hold on there DEXX; Lets not put the cart before the horse. You&#8217;ve seen this card do 80 mb/s ! ?<br />
  I try in vainly to wait for &#8220;the truth to ring&#8221; when I hear it; But what I have heard one to many times, is that this card slows down !, when increasing the number of cf&#8217;s from two to four ? And the only sumwhat lagit. test I&#8217;ve found claims 40 mb/s ! A single CF (233mb/s) or better will do that.  The only word you have to know is &#8220;DMA&#8221; And thats because there are well over a thousand CF to IDE adaptors, for a dollar,on EBay, that are not ! They max at 20mb/s. DMA and UDMA are your clues to a CF to IDE adaptor to do the job. But don&#8217;t assume!; that is, that a $24 name brand adaptor with &#8220;those words&#8221; will cut the mustard. In fact I have had no responce from &#8220;Addonics&#8221; and a $3 CF to IDE DNA &#8211; UDMA from China, has been benchmarked by the Hong Kong supplier and a users who says it listed (in Linux) as UDMA 4 and exceeded 40mb/s with a &#8220;Scandisk Extreme 4&#8243; The CF to SATA are poping up at 50mb/s benches (faster CF though) and these may break the bank at $5 to $8 (China) The final point is that a &#8220;no card needed&#8221; USB flash will max out about 33mb/s (with 233x &#8211; 266x memory) So a $50 card and two or four high speed CF&#8217;s!?!. LUCIE GOT SOME SPLAIN&#8217;IN TO DO !</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Terry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gadget Thumbs CXXXIV &#187; Coolest Gadgets</title>
		<link>http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20071023/raid-storage-in-the-a-flash-%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-316262</link>
		<dc:creator>Gadget Thumbs CXXXIV &#187; Coolest Gadgets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20071023/raid-storage-in-the-a-flash-%e2%80%a6/#comment-316262</guid>
		<description>[...] RAID Storage in the a flash … [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] RAID Storage in the a flash … [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dexx</title>
		<link>http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20071023/raid-storage-in-the-a-flash-%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-316163</link>
		<dc:creator>Dexx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 06:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20071023/raid-storage-in-the-a-flash-%e2%80%a6/#comment-316163</guid>
		<description>and what if i put 2 of this 80 MB/sec card in in raid</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and what if i put 2 of this 80 MB/sec card in in raid</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
