<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sony announces ultra thin OLED HDTV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20071002/sony-announces-ultra-thin-oled-hdtv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20071002/sony-announces-ultra-thin-oled-hdtv/</link>
	<description>Playing with cool gadgets in the ongoing search for the Coolest Gadget</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:16:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Super high res OLEDs for mobiles? Anytime now.. &#187; Coolest Gadgets</title>
		<link>http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20071002/sony-announces-ultra-thin-oled-hdtv/comment-page-1/#comment-315013</link>
		<dc:creator>Super high res OLEDs for mobiles? Anytime now.. &#187; Coolest Gadgets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 00:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20071002/sony-announces-ultra-thin-oled-hdtv/#comment-315013</guid>
		<description>[...] at Sony&#8217;s latest foray: an impressive, yet small and very expensive device, proving that OLED [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at Sony&#8217;s latest foray: an impressive, yet small and very expensive device, proving that OLED [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EEJ</title>
		<link>http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20071002/sony-announces-ultra-thin-oled-hdtv/comment-page-1/#comment-314444</link>
		<dc:creator>EEJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 20:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20071002/sony-announces-ultra-thin-oled-hdtv/#comment-314444</guid>
		<description>Ummm, how is 960x450 able to display an HD image? 

Even enhanced definition is 480 progressive lines, which I&#039;m assuming wouldn&#039;t display properly on this tv.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummm, how is 960&#215;450 able to display an HD image? </p>
<p>Even enhanced definition is 480 progressive lines, which I&#8217;m assuming wouldn&#8217;t display properly on this tv.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
