<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Turntable that sounds pure gold</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20070913/turntable-that-sounds-pure-gold/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20070913/turntable-that-sounds-pure-gold/</link>
	<description>Playing with cool gadgets in the ongoing search for the Coolest Gadget</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:29:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neagle</title>
		<link>http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20070913/turntable-that-sounds-pure-gold/comment-page-1/#comment-313039</link>
		<dc:creator>Neagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 22:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20070913/turntable-that-sounds-pure-gold/#comment-313039</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s still only arecord player.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s still only arecord player.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kingofthenerds</title>
		<link>http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20070913/turntable-that-sounds-pure-gold/comment-page-1/#comment-312829</link>
		<dc:creator>kingofthenerds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 20:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20070913/turntable-that-sounds-pure-gold/#comment-312829</guid>
		<description>sound quality from records generally are better.  the only thing about records are that they are more prone to physical wear and tear.  given a brand new, never played record and a quality stylus and turntable, you will achieve sound that is much &#039;warmer&#039; with a much wider dynamic range than its digital counterparts.  MP3 quality is garbage.  even CD quality is nothing compared to hi-fi standards.  you need some sort of lossless format with no compression to even get close to ideal vinyl quality.  just my 0.02.  =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sound quality from records generally are better.  the only thing about records are that they are more prone to physical wear and tear.  given a brand new, never played record and a quality stylus and turntable, you will achieve sound that is much &#8216;warmer&#8217; with a much wider dynamic range than its digital counterparts.  MP3 quality is garbage.  even CD quality is nothing compared to hi-fi standards.  you need some sort of lossless format with no compression to even get close to ideal vinyl quality.  just my 0.02.  =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
