Comments on: Hotmail takes chequered flag in webmail storage http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20070816/hotmail-takes-chequered-flag-in-webmail-storage/ Playing with cool gadgets in the ongoing search for the Coolest Gadget Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:35:51 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: bill weaver http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20070816/hotmail-takes-chequered-flag-in-webmail-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-312284 bill weaver Thu, 06 Sep 2007 18:38:22 +0000 http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20070816/hotmail-takes-chequered-flag-in-webmail-storage/#comment-312284 Though you mention it glancingly in the article, the headline and first paragraph are pretty misleading. "Hotmail takes chequered flag in webmail storage" - Doesn't Yahoo! already have the chequered flag here? "Just when everyone thought that GMail is king when it comes to webmail storage, Microsoft steals Google’s thunder by making available up to 5GB of storage space for users, making a 3GB jump from the current 2GB capacity." - Again, isn't Yahoo! king? Either way, it's good to see storage limits rising! -bill Though you mention it glancingly in the article, the headline and first paragraph are pretty misleading.

“Hotmail takes chequered flag in webmail storage” – Doesn’t Yahoo! already have the chequered flag here?

“Just when everyone thought that GMail is king when it comes to webmail storage, Microsoft steals Google’s thunder by making available up to 5GB of storage space for users, making a 3GB jump from the current 2GB capacity.” – Again, isn’t Yahoo! king?

Either way, it’s good to see storage limits rising! -bill

]]> By: rory http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20070816/hotmail-takes-chequered-flag-in-webmail-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-311038 rory Sat, 18 Aug 2007 09:41:07 +0000 http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20070816/hotmail-takes-chequered-flag-in-webmail-storage/#comment-311038 however, is hotmail not still plagued with gigantic irritating adverts and a clumsy interface? however, is hotmail not still plagued with gigantic irritating adverts and a clumsy interface?

]]>