<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cellphone a surefire hit with men&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20070628/cellphone-a-surefire-hit-with-men/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20070628/cellphone-a-surefire-hit-with-men/</link>
	<description>Playing with cool gadgets in the ongoing search for the Coolest Gadget</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:11:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AutoRider</title>
		<link>http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20070628/cellphone-a-surefire-hit-with-men/comment-page-1/#comment-311223</link>
		<dc:creator>AutoRider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20070628/cellphone-a-surefire-hit-with-men/#comment-311223</guid>
		<description>This is crazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tatsumi</title>
		<link>http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20070628/cellphone-a-surefire-hit-with-men/comment-page-1/#comment-308354</link>
		<dc:creator>Tatsumi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 19:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20070628/cellphone-a-surefire-hit-with-men/#comment-308354</guid>
		<description>Why doesn&#039;t it just put a computer-generated graphic overlay that look like what the body would look like. Then it wouldn&#039;t be &quot;real&quot;, therefore it would be ok right? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why doesn&#8217;t it just put a computer-generated graphic overlay that look like what the body would look like. Then it wouldn&#8217;t be &#8220;real&#8221;, therefore it would be ok right? <img src='http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edwin</title>
		<link>http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20070628/cellphone-a-surefire-hit-with-men/comment-page-1/#comment-308296</link>
		<dc:creator>Edwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 01:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20070628/cellphone-a-surefire-hit-with-men/#comment-308296</guid>
		<description>Sorry G, will make sure the odd bits and ends are properly pixelized when the image is shrunk down in size.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry G, will make sure the odd bits and ends are properly pixelized when the image is shrunk down in size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20070628/cellphone-a-surefire-hit-with-men/comment-page-1/#comment-308289</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 20:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20070628/cellphone-a-surefire-hit-with-men/#comment-308289</guid>
		<description>This was out 8 or 9 years ago, but it was in green and didn&#039;t look as good as the pic above by any means.  Sony had released there infered camera to see in the dark and if you where looking at someone with a bikini on or thin clothing you could see through it with a filter of some sort.   A while after people starting figuring it out they took it off the market and changed a few things about it so it didn&#039;t do it anymore.  I happen to know this because I bought one when they came out BEFORE I knew what it did.  Here are a couple of pics to see for your self.
NSFW
NSFW
NSFW
http://www.kaya-optics.com/products/voyuerism.shtml
http://www.conspiracynews.org/images/shot01.jpg
http://www.conspiracynews.org/images/shot02.jpg
Here is an artical explaining about it and what sony&#039;s official statement was.
http://cooltech.iafrica.com/technews/archive/august/667462.htm

And just as I was looking around I found this artical on mobile phones doing the same thing!
http://www.textually.org/picturephoning/archives/2004/10/005822.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was out 8 or 9 years ago, but it was in green and didn&#8217;t look as good as the pic above by any means.  Sony had released there infered camera to see in the dark and if you where looking at someone with a bikini on or thin clothing you could see through it with a filter of some sort.   A while after people starting figuring it out they took it off the market and changed a few things about it so it didn&#8217;t do it anymore.  I happen to know this because I bought one when they came out BEFORE I knew what it did.  Here are a couple of pics to see for your self.<br />
NSFW<br />
NSFW<br />
NSFW<br />
<a href="http://www.kaya-optics.com/products/voyuerism.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.kaya-optics.com/products/voyuerism.shtml</a><br />
<a href="http://www.conspiracynews.org/images/shot01.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.conspiracynews.org/images/shot01.jpg</a><br />
<a href="http://www.conspiracynews.org/images/shot02.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.conspiracynews.org/images/shot02.jpg</a><br />
Here is an artical explaining about it and what sony&#8217;s official statement was.<br />
<a href="http://cooltech.iafrica.com/technews/archive/august/667462.htm" rel="nofollow">http://cooltech.iafrica.com/technews/archive/august/667462.htm</a></p>
<p>And just as I was looking around I found this artical on mobile phones doing the same thing!<br />
<a href="http://www.textually.org/picturephoning/archives/2004/10/005822.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.textually.org/picturephoning/archives/2004/10/005822.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G</title>
		<link>http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20070628/cellphone-a-surefire-hit-with-men/comment-page-1/#comment-308288</link>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20070628/cellphone-a-surefire-hit-with-men/#comment-308288</guid>
		<description>Come on, guys.  A little more tact in your inline images, please.  I read my feeds in an open office and this image is barely blurred.  Try looking at this post from 4 feet away; it&#039;s indistinguishable from porn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on, guys.  A little more tact in your inline images, please.  I read my feeds in an open office and this image is barely blurred.  Try looking at this post from 4 feet away; it&#8217;s indistinguishable from porn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
