<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supersonic Ear by Wild Planet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20051111/supersonic-ear-by-wild-planet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20051111/supersonic-ear-by-wild-planet/</link>
	<description>Playing with cool gadgets in the ongoing search for the Coolest Gadget</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:53:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20051111/supersonic-ear-by-wild-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-412594</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20051111/supersonic-ear-by-wild-planet/#comment-412594</guid>
		<description>This is rather over rated review of the supersonic ear. 
The headphone quality was bad and I found greatly improved sound from hi quality headphone, though I still wasnt able to hear anything that I couldnt hear without the &#039;ear&#039; on, albeit amplified by the device. 
It is of fragile low quality plastic construction, especially the battery connector. OK as a stethoscope for hearing heartbeat for example but it couldnt detect the sound of my noisy boiler at the back of my house which I can hear quite easily from my bedroom. They should have given it a &#039;manual&#039; rather than an automatic sensitivity detection control too!.
Sorry about the negative review but I was taken in by this review you gave and looking forward to receiving it. I even spent 20 mins looking for a mistake I might of made..like not removing a protection cover or something!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is rather over rated review of the supersonic ear.<br />
The headphone quality was bad and I found greatly improved sound from hi quality headphone, though I still wasnt able to hear anything that I couldnt hear without the &#8216;ear&#8217; on, albeit amplified by the device.<br />
It is of fragile low quality plastic construction, especially the battery connector. OK as a stethoscope for hearing heartbeat for example but it couldnt detect the sound of my noisy boiler at the back of my house which I can hear quite easily from my bedroom. They should have given it a &#8216;manual&#8217; rather than an automatic sensitivity detection control too!.<br />
Sorry about the negative review but I was taken in by this review you gave and looking forward to receiving it. I even spent 20 mins looking for a mistake I might of made..like not removing a protection cover or something!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Object Caching 271/275 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.coolest-gadgets.com

Served from: www.coolest-gadgets.com @ 2012-02-10 15:43:30 -->
